Sunday Sermon: Now you can be Christian AND grok Science AND not go to Hell!

Rude, offensive, disrespectful cartoon of the Birthday Boy. No riots, please. The co-discoverer of the Theory of Natural Selection was the younger naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1913). Though Charles Darwin had worked out his version earlier, he had been reluctant to publish his ideas for fear of the religious controversy and scandal they would cause. When Wallace sent him his manuscript, they agreed to share credit for the discovery.

PIZZAQ: Both Darwin and Wallace said their inspiration to discover the theory of Natural Selection came to them after reading the same book. What book?

Newsday (daily newspaper)
Long Island, New York USA
Sunday 12 February 2006

Compromise between
Darwin and God

In effort to challenge the belief
by some that God, Darwin’s theories
don’t jibe, clergy group calls for coexistence

BY CAROL EISENBERG, STAFF WRITER

The Rev. Richard E. Edwards will not mince words in his sermon today about God and Charles Darwin, the 19th century naturalist whose theory of evolution rocked the world.

"I want to reaffirm the compatibility of Biblical tradition and modern science," said Edwards, pastor of Stony Brook Community Church, a small Methodist congregation that draws members from the nearby university and medical center. "This is a community where science counts, and where folks really need to hear that."

[VLEEPTRON guide to colleges and universities: The State University of New York @ Stony Brook is one of the top science universities in the USA. It's the home of the C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics. Chen Ning (Frank/Franklin) Yang won the 1957 Nobel Physics Prize (with T.D. Lee) for a fundamental discovery regarding the parity violation (assymetrical behavior) of subatomic particles.]

At a time when conservative Christians are mounting aggressive challenges to the teaching of evolution in public schools, Edwards is one of about 400 pastors nationwide, mostly from mainline Protestant churches, who are participating in "Evolution Sunday" to promote the idea that Christianity and science may coexist peacefully.

Today, on Darwin's birthday, some will draw upon the Book of Job to validate the innate human thirst for understanding. Others will lead discussions about how to reconcile a divine Creator with the notion that life evolved through a random process of natural selection.

"I believe that instead of suppressing or falsifying science, we people of faith need to go back to the theological drawing board in order to rethink our existing theology in the light of new data -- just as Martin Luther and John Calvin did nearly five centuries ago," said the Rev. Byron E. Shafer of Rutgers Presbyterian Church on the Upper West Side of Manhattan.

Evolution Sunday is part of a broader campaign begun a year ago called the Clergy Letter Project. Through e-mail and word-of-mouth, 10,266 clergy have now signed an online letter backing evolution as "a foundational scientific truth, one that has stood up to rigorous scrutiny and upon which much of human knowledge and achievement rests."

The project is the brainchild of Michael Zimmerman, a biologist rather than a clergyman, who said he was fed up with Christian preachers who told people that they had to choose between evolution and God -- "and that if you choose evolution, you're going to hell, and if you choose our version of religion, you'll be saved."

"One of the goals of the Clergy Letter Project," Zimmerman said, "is to demonstrate that the choice that people are trying to foist on them is a false dichotomy. The fact that thousands of clergy are standing up and saying, 'We are comfortable in our beliefs, in our faith and in our God, and we are comfortable with modern science,' is a very forceful statement."

Zimmerman, a Wisconsin college administrator, declined to elaborate on his own religious beliefs beyond saying he does not attend church.

Many of the clergy participating in Evolution Sunday say they have no doubt that God is behind the process of natural selection -- but unlike backers of intelligent design, they describe those beliefs as religious, rather than scientific, and therefore, appropriate for Sunday school rather than science class.

A few acknowledge they are struggling themselves with how to reconcile Darwin's concepts with a Christian world view.

The notion that life evolved through a random and often brutal process does not square easily, Shafer said, with Christian notions of creation -- or, for that matter, a benevolent God.

"People want to believe that we humans are special in the sight of God, and that we are a distinct and separate creation," he said. "So obviously those who are challenging that concept have a lot of explaining to do."

Others are more sanguine about reconciling the world views -- if only to enhance their appreciation of the complexity of God's creation.

"Does the theory of natural selection raise questions for us?" asked the Rev. Catherine Schuyler, Protestant chaplain at Stony Brook University and pastor of Grace Presbyterian Church in Selden, who is married to Edwards.

"Yes, of course. But I don't think questions are such a scary thing. Questions are how we go deeper into our understanding, and therefore, deeper into our own faith."

- 30 -

Copyright 2006 Newsday Inc.