Pentagon seals Guantanamo base prison from media access, scrutiny
In this April 6, 2006 file photo, reviewed by US military officials, the central cellblock passage of cells is pictured without detainees present, at Camp Delta 2 & 3 maximum security dentention center, at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base in Cuba. (AP photo)Associated Press
Thursday 15 June 2006
Military blocks
media access
to Guantanamo
by BEN FOX, Associated Press Writer
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico -- More than 1,000 journalists have visited Guantanamo Bay since the U.S. military began locking up suspected al-Qaida and Taliban militants there 4.5 years ago. But access has been severely restricted: Journalists could not talk to detainees, they had to be accompanied by a military escort and their photos were censored.
Now, the Pentagon [US Department of Defense] has shut down access entirely -- at least temporarily -- expelling reporters this week and triggering an outcry from human rights groups, attorneys and media organizations even as the prison comes under renewed criticism for the suicides of three detainees last weekend.
"Now is the time when the media is most needed," said Clive Stafford Smith, an attorney who has filed legal challenges on behalf of about 40 detainees. "The fact that right now, the most important time in the history of Guantanamo, they are being banned is un-American."
Pentagon officials defended the temporary ban on media, saying guards and base officials are preoccupied with investigating the deaths and maintaining security as detainees become more defiant. A clash with guards in May left six detainees injured. Another 10 prisoners were on hunger strike Thursday, including six being force-fed with nasal tubes.
U.S. officials say the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, which sits on cactus-studded hills in southeastern Cuba overlooking the Caribbean and mangrove forests, has been unusually open to journalists -- despite media complaints that access while they are at the prison is severely curtailed and requests for interviews often vanish in the military bureaucracy.
"It's the most transparent detention facility in the history of warfare," insisted Navy Lt. Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon, a Pentagon spokesman, echoing comments by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.
But the Pentagon rejected all requests by news organizations this week to cover the investigation and aftermath of the suicides, the first detainee deaths since Guantanamo opened.
About 10 news organizations, including The Associated Press, were to cover a military tribunal this week for one of the 10 detainees charged with crimes. But the hearing was postponed and hours before they were to depart for Guantanamo, the Pentagon canceled the authorizations that reporters need to visit.
Reporters cover the hearings from the courtroom -- where they are barred from speaking with participants, even during breaks. Or they can view the proceedings on a large-screen TV near a media center where military censors peer at their photographs and video and decide what is out of bounds.
On Wednesday, the Pentagon expelled two journalists -- from the Los Angeles Times and The Miami Herald -- who arrived at Guantanamo on a charter flight Sunday and two others from The Charlotte Observer, who were at the base for coverage of a commander from North Carolina.
The Paris-based group Reporters Without Borders said Thursday the expulsions damage the credibility of the U.S. government.
"We condemn the Pentagon decision and we call on the U.S. government to take the necessary steps to guarantee the media free access to the naval base at Guantanamo," the group said.
Media visits have been common, drawing journalists from dozens of countries, but they have always come with thick strings attached.
Access to the base is available only through military planes or small charters. The charters take about 3 hours to fly from Florida to Guantanamo because they can't travel through Cuban airspace and must circle around the island.
On the base, a 10-page list of ground rules bars journalists from interviewing anyone without approval and prohibits photos of detainee faces and base features, such as radar or the coastline. The military says such restrictions are needed for security and to protect detainees' privacy.
But critics say the military is being disingenuous in saying it wants to protect detainees' privacy. One prisoner, speaking in English, once told a visiting AP reporter that he wanted to talk. But when the reporter asked the military if she could interview the detainee, the answer was no.
Other reporters have been hustled away when prisoners have tried to communicate with them -- through food slots in the cells of the highest-security section, or from behind curtains at the medical clinic.
Gordon said regular media access is scheduled to resume next week, with journalists from three European news organizations taking a tour that can take two months or more to arrange.
But without access to the detainees, Stafford Smith said such visits amount to little more than propaganda.
"The media sees a very sanitized view of what's going on," he said.
- 30 -
Copyright © 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
posted by Vleeptron Dude | 04:02
2 Comments:
This is the image that the democrats should use as one of their campaign issues. This is the world that the Republicans have created. Criminals.
No, it would be a crappy issue. The detainees are America's Most Demonized. No Americans (no voters) cares what happens to them, and if more commit suicide or starve themselves to death, the Americans who somehow managed to elect and re-elect Bush -- will smile and say, "Good." Watch the Fox News Channel commentators and listen to the radio Limbaugh clones. The three Guantanamo suicides were big news and had the capacity to do a lot of damage to the Bush war machine. But this will be an easy speed bump for Bush to get through. Nobody cares about these people. People like Ann Coulter are saying, *Good -- encourage more of them to kill themselves, give each of them a rope.* And then it's Open Phones, and the call-in crowd agrees and thanks her for being a Great American.
It should be a mystery how the Third Reich -- not some jungle backwater like Myanmar, but Europe's most civilized nation, the people who invented Protestantism, a place with a great and brilliant ancient university in every city -- managed to make millions of Jews, Rom Gypsies, lefties, homosexuals vanish to Who Knows Where. Where were the complaints? Where was the outrage?
By the time the big plans began, the average German voter/citizen believed what the government had told them (with ceaseless propaganda) about these groups -- that they were all dangerous enemies of the state, and if they were allowed to stay free in society, they were undermining the nation with treasonous plots and schemes. Hitler and the Nazis were the political strong men who saw this clearly, whom Germans could trust to keep Germany strong and safe against gangsters, perverts and (drum roll please) terrorists.
Here, close your eyes and think of Hillary Clinton. Will she take the podium at the Democratic National Convention and loudly demand full legal rights and protections for the Guantanamo detainees? Will she loudly demand the US close Guantanamo and its Eastern Euro and North African Vanishing Camps? Will she demand International Red Cross inspections for these superdemonized sand niggers and towelheads?
Close your eyes and think of Al Gore. Will his political HANDLERS allow him to demand fundamental humane treatment and legal protection for these superdespised people? He's testing the waters for a 2008 run by presenting himself as a Champion of the Environment. He's trying to frighten Americans for votes just like Bush is, but the threat to the environment is a much safer bogeyman. No one on a talk radio or Fox show can accuse him of defending and sympathizing with Osama bin Ladin's evil America-hating Christian-killing fiends.
The Guantanamo detainees -- charged with nothing, no right to petition any judge with a writ of habeas corpus, held eternally -- are a very important Canary in America's Coal Mine. The American people have come to totally not care what happens to them. Their only advocates and defenders are (yawn) the ACLU, hippie leftist professors, the Liberal-controlled Media, United Nations types.
Once a government can demonstrate to itself that they can successfully turn a group of people into a Nobody Cares What Happens group ... The notion that the Bushies and whoever follows them will only confine their strategy of demonization and political dehumanization to this group ... no, once this political strategy *works,* it will inevitably be expanded to any group with the potential to be turned into a Nobody Cares group. Such hateable people are the raw material that keeps politicians in power and makes them more powerful.
Post a Comment
<< Home